|
Bulletin
Volume 4, Issue 3, Winter 1998
Neuroendocrine
& Pituitary Center | Referrals
| Neuroendocrine
Bulletin Archive
Guestbook | Neurosurgery
Home | Links
Articles in this issue:
Prolactinomas
and Pregnancy
Anne Klibanski, M.D.
Prolactin, a pro-lactational hormone,
is secreted by the pituitary gland in a pulsatile fashion and is
kept within the normal range predominantly under the influence of
dopaminergic inhibition throughout adult life. During pregnancy,
prolactin secretion in normal women markedly increases from the
beginning of pregnancy until delivery. The marked rise in serum
prolactin concentrations, often into a range of 100 to 200 ng/ml
or higher is the result of an actual increase in lactotroph number
and capacity because of stimulation by estradiol. Estrogen both
stimulates lactotroph number and prolactin secretion by a direct
effect on prolactin transcription and also cell proliferation, and,
by an effect of estrogen to decrease central dopaminergic tone.
Hyperprolactinemia from a number of pathologic conditions including
a pituitary tumor, primary hypothyroidism, renal failure and secondary
to a number of medications including psychotropic medications, antidepressants
and a number of antihypertensives, can elevate serum prolactin levels
and interfere with normal ovulatory function and fertility. Pathologic
hyperprolactinemia has long been known to be associated with amenorrhea,
anovulation and infertility. Of importance also, is the syndrome
of intermittent or transient hyperprolactinemia found in a number
of women with regular menstrual periods but luteal phase insufficiency.
In a paper by Huang et al1 serum prolactin levels measured in 151
patients with luteal phase deficiency showed that 21.9% of patients
had mild hyperprolactinemia most commonly seen around the time of
ovulation. In such patients, successful pregnancy can typically
be achieved with the initiation of dopamine agonist therapy if this
is found to be the only underlying abnormality. Therefore, there
exists a large spectrum of abnormalities associated with hyperprolactinemia
that can interfere with normal ovulatory function and conception
in women.
Although prolactin secretion in
patients with prolactin secreting adenomas, both microadenomas
(<10 mm) and macroadenomas (>10 mm) is typically autonomous and
poorly responsive to normal physiologic stimulants to prolactin
release, patients with underlying prolactin secreting tumors are
at risk for the development of tumor enlargement causing symptoms
during pregnancy. Pituitary tumors themselves may enlarge under
the influence of high endogenous levels of gonadal steroids, specifically
estradiol. In addition, there is marked hyperplasia of normal
lactotrophs. Enlargement of a prolactinoma during pregnancy may
be associated with symptoms due to tumor mass such as headaches,
and specifically neuroophthamalogic abnormalities including visual
field loss. The likelihood of symptomatic enlargement during pregnancy
is directly related to the size of the underlying lesion, and
in part, the extent and anatomic configuration of the tumor itself.
A number of studies have investigated the outcome of patients
with pregnancy and prolactinomas2. In patients with microprolactinomas,
the risk has been reported to be between 2 to 5%. In the MGH experience
of over 100 pregnancies in patients with microprolactinomas, progressive
symptomatic enlargement causing neurologic deficits or visual
field loss is extremely rare. However, in patients with macroprolactinomas,
the likelihood of symptomatic tumor enlargement is much higher
and can affect up to a quarter or more of patients. Patients who
have pituitary macroadenomas with significant suprasellar extension
may be at higher risk for the development of visual field abnormalities
during pregnancy than patients with pituitary tumors which extend
laterally or inferiorly into the cavernous sinus. Overall, innumerable
studies indicate that the majority of patients with prolactinomas,
regardless of size, can be safely managed during pregnancy without
dopamine agonist therapy.
How should patients with known prolactinomas
be monitored throughout pregnancy? Because the majority of patients
with prolactinomas do not develop symptomatic enlargement, it
is our policy to discontinue dopamine agonist therapy when the
pregnancy test becomes positive. This approach is followed uniformly
in almost all patients. If a patient is beginning a pregnancy
with a known lesion with previous significant chiasmal compression
and visual field loss, and now has a lesion not compressing but
nearly abutting the optic chiasm, the decision as to whether to
continue dopamine agonist therapy during pregnancy must be made
on an individual basis. In the vast majority of cases, however,
patients do not continue to receive dopamine agonist therapy during
pregnancy. Although there are no data to suggest that dopamine
agonists, such as Parlodel, are teratogenic, these medications
are not approved for use during pregnancy. Should prolactin levels
be monitored during pregnancy in a patient with an underlying
prolactinoma? We do not routinely monitor prolactin levels during
pregnancy for the following two reasons. First, prolactin levels
in a normal pregnancy can increase to levels in the hundreds range
or higher and may be indistinguishable from prolactin levels during
pregnancy in a patient with a prolactinoma. Second, a patient
would not be treated during pregnancy if the prolactin elevation
were not associated with clear-cut clinical symptoms such as neurologic
or neuroophthamalogic signs. Therefore, the best way to monitor
patients during pregnancy with an underlying prolactinoma is to
make the patient aware of symptoms that may be suggestive of mass
effect such as headache, visual abnormalities or systemic signs
consistent with pituitary insufficiency. We monitor patients routinely
throughout pregnancy. In patients with macroprolactinomas, visual
fields should be done during pregnancy on a monthly basis. In
patients with microadenomas, the frequency of follow-up is somewhat
individual dependent upon the patient. Given the low prevalence
of tumor enlargement in patients with microadenomas, formal visual
fields testing once each trimester is probably sufficient but
should certainly be done sooner should the patient develop any
symptoms consistent with mass effect.
Postpartum patients with idiopathic
hyperprolactinemia or microprolactinomas can certainly be allowed
to nurse. Prolactin should be rechecked at three to six months
following pregnancy and if prolactin continues to be elevated
and is associated with menstrual abnormalities and other symptoms,
dopamine agonist therapy should be reinstituted unless the patient
wants to continue nursing. In patients with macroadenomas, resumption
of dopamine agonist therapy postpartum should be individually
made depending upon the patient's symptoms and need for medical
control of the underlying tumor.
The recent introduction of Dostinex
(cabergoline), a long-acting D2 specific dopamine agonist, has
changed the routine management of prolactinomas. Because of the
improved efficacy and lower incidence of side effects with this
medication, patients are often started on cabergoline as an initial
mode of therapy given on a once-a-week or twice-a-week basis.
In patients who are specifically seeking pregnancy, the decision
as to what dopamine agonist to use becomes more problematic. Parlodel
has been in clinical use for over twenty years and there is extensive
experience in inducing ovulation in patients with Parlodel. Although
cabergoline has been in use for several years in Europe, the experience
in inducing pregnancy in terms of safety is still relatively new.
In a series published in 1997 by Ciccarelli et al, 47 women were
treated with cabergoline for 1 to 82 months. There were nine patients
reported who became pregnant. In two patients, one patient with
a microadenoma and one patient with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia,
prolactin levels remained in the normal range for one to three
years after delivery. This series is too small to determine whether
the spontaneous resolution which is sometimes reported after pregnancy
in patients with underlying hyperprolactinemia is at all associated
with the use of cabergoline. The experience to assess the possibility
of teratogenicity of cabergoline is limited to a 1996 report by
Musatti et al published in the European literature.4 This series
reports 226 pregnancies in 205 women with follow-up data available
in 204 women and there was no increase in the miscarriage rate,
distribution of birth weights, or rate of congenital malformations
reported among the babies of mothers who became pregnant while
receiving cabergoline. Although these data are reassuring, the
long-term safety of this medication in inducing pregnancy is in
no way comparable to the data available in patients who have become
pregnant on Parlodel. Therefore, our recommendation is to use
Parlodel in patients who are actively trying to achieve a pregnancy.
If a patient is receiving Dostinex for therapy of hyperprolactinemia
and becomes pregnant, these preliminary data are reassuring and
it will be anticipated that a large number of other such pregnancies
will be reported in the next few years.
The spectrum of reproductive abnormalities
associated with hyperprolactinemia ranges from frank amenorrhea
and galactorrhea to very subtle luteal phase deficiencies manifested
only by periovulatory hyperprolactinemia. Reproductive abnormalities
associated with hyperprolactinemia in women typically respond
very well to dopamine agonist therapy. Pregnancies can be achieved
in patients with underlying normal gonadotroph function by inhibiting
prolactin with a dopamine agonist. There is no evidence that radiation
therapy will prevent tumor enlargement during pregnancy in a patient
with an underlying prolactinoma and the radiation therapy itself
may be deleterious to gonadotroph function in patients who still
have gonadotroph capacity. Transsphenoidal surgery can be used
in patients to control hyperprolactinemia and tumor size in patients
who are unresponsive or poorly responsive to dopamine agonist
therapy. Symptomatic tumor enlargement during pregnancy rarely
occurs and is best managed with the re-institution of Parlodel
therapy. Finally, transsphenoidal surgery can be considered in
those patients who have symptoms during pregnancy that are refractory
to dopamine agonist administration or who have rapidly developing
neurologic symptoms.
References
1. Huang KE, Bonfiglio TA, Muechler EK. Transient hyperprolactinemia
in infertile women with luteal phase deficiency. Obstet Gynecol.
1991; 78 (4): 651-655.
2. Molitch ME. Management of prolactinomas. Ann Rev Med. 1989;
40: 225-232.
3. Ciccarelli E, Grottoli S, Razzore P, et al. Long-term treatment
with cabergoline, a new long-lasting ergoline derivate, in idiopathic
or tumorous hyperprolactinaemia and outcome of drug-induced pregnancy.
J Endocrinol Invest. 1997; 20(9): 547-551.
4. Robert E, Musatti L, Piscitelli G, Ferrari CI. Pregnancy outcome
after treatment with the ergot derivative, cabergoline. Reprod
Toxicol. 1996; 10(4): 333-337.
Central Hypothyroidism
due to Pituitary/Hypothalamic Dysfunction
Karen K. Miller, M.D.
Central hypothyroidism is an important
complication of pituitary disease and, because TSH levels are not
useful, the diagnosis and therapeutic considerations are difficult.
Central hypothyroidism is defined
as a reduction in circulating thyroid hormone as a result of inadequate
stimulation of a normal thyroid gland by TSH and may be secondary,
due to pituitary disease, or tertiary, due to hypothalamic dysfunction.
Causes include all pathologic processes that affect the hypothalamus
or pituitary including tumors, Sheehan's syndrome, idiopathic
hypopituitarism and infiltrative diseases, such as sarcoidosis,
histiocytosis and lymphocytic hypophysitis. Radiation-induced
central hypothyroidism is common in patients irradiated for pituitary
tumors. Tsang et al. retrospectively examined records of 160 patients
who had received radiation for non-functioning pituitary adenomas
8 to 22 years before and found that 65% required thyroid replacement
therapy, with 23% of patients' hypothyroidism directly attributable
to the radiation therapy received [1]. In addition, hypothyroidism
is common in patients receiving radiation for nasopharyngeal or
paranasal sinus tumors and brain tumors. Constine et al. evaluated
the endocrine function of 32 patients who had received radiation
for brain tumors, including gliomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas,
from 2 to 13 years before, and found that 65% had low free T4
levels. The probability of hypothyroidism depended on the amount
of radiation received, with doses of more than 5000 rads (50 Gy)
to the pituitary and hypothalamus necessary for the development
of hypothyroidism. Moreover, the longer the interval since irradiation,
the more likely a patient was to have developed hypothyroidism
[2]. Therefore, the percentage of patients developing hypothyroidism
may have been even higher had the follow-up been longer. In addition,
because the onset of hypothyroidism may occur years after the
administration of the radiation, constant vigilance for the signs
and symptoms of hypothyroidism in this population is imperative
and yearly monitoring of thyroid hormone levels obligatory.
As in primary hypothyroidism, the
symptoms of central hypothyroidism include fatigue, apathy, weight
gain, dry skin, constipation and cold intolerance. Signs include
periorbital edema, cool extremities, delayed relaxation of the
deep tendon reflexes and bradycardia. The signs and symptoms of
central hypothyroidism mimic those of several other common conditions,
and this disorder is therefore difficult to diagnose. A low free
T4 or free T4 index and a low TSH in the setting of pituitary
disease and signs and symptoms of hypothyroidism point in a straightforward
manner to the diagnosis of central hypothyroidism. Unfortunately,
however, the TSH is most commonly in the normal range in cases
of central hypothyroidism, creating a confusing picture. Research
has shown that, in some of these cases, a bio-inactive TSH resulting
from abnormal glycosylation of the TSH molecule [3-6] explains
the higher than expected TSH levels. Therefore, although the serum
TSH is measured as normal in routine assays, performed by immunoradiometric
assay (IRMA) or immunochemiluminometric assay (ICMA), only a small
proportion of the TSH molecules function normally. Although these
"normal" TSH values can confound the diagnosis of central
hypothyroidism, it should be noted that a "normal" or
slightly high TSH is inappropriate when circulating thyroid hormone
levels are low, and that in cases of primary hypothyroidism, the
TSH would be expected to be much higher. Therefore, TSH is not
a useful screen for the diagnosis of this disorder.
The management of central hypothyroidism
is further complicated by the fact that the TSH cannot be used
to monitor therapeutic response to L-thyroxine therapy. When pituitary
pathology is not present, the TSH provides an accurate method
of assessing the appropriateness of circulating thyroid hormone
levels for each particular patient. However, pituitary or hypothalamic
pathology often interrupts the feedback mechanism by preventing
normal release of TSH and/or TRH. The consequences of this are
two-fold. First, patients with pituitary pathology or who have
been irradiated cannot be screened for hypothyroidism with TSH
levels alone, as a normal TSH often belies central hypothyroidism.
Moreover, the usually routine monitoring of thyroid replacement
becomes more problematic. Inadequate replacement doses of l-thyroxine
often result in markedly subnormal TSH values. Therefore, TSH
values are not reliable as an accurate reflection of thyroid status,
and a free T4 or free T4 index must be used to adjust the replacement
dose. However, as in primary hypothyroidism, when appropriately
diagnosed and treated, management of central hypothyoidism can
result in prompt resolution of symptoms.
References
1. Tsang R, Brierley J, Panzarella
T, et al., 1994 Radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma: treatment
outcome and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
30:557-565.
2. Constine L, Woolf P, Cann D, et al. 1993 Hypothalamic-pituitary
dysfunction after radiation for brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 328:87-94.
3. Papandreou M, Persani L, Asteria C, Ronin C, and Beck-Peccoz
P. 1993 Variable carbohydrate structures of circulating thyrotropin
as studied by lectin affinity chromatography in different clinical
conditions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:393.
4. Miura Y, Perkel V, Papenberg K, Johnson M, and Magner J. 1989
Concanavalin-A, lentil, and ricin lectin affinity binding characteristic
of human thyrotropin: differences in the sialylation of thyrotropin
in sera of euthyroid, primary and central hypothyroid patients.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 69:985-995.
5. Taylor T and Weintraub B. 1989 Altered thyrotropin (TSH) carbohydrate
structures in hypothalamic hypothyroidism created by paraventricular
nuclear lesions are corrected by in vivo TSH-releasing hormone
administration. Endocrinology. 125:2189-2203.
6. Magner J, Klibanski A, Fein H, et al. 1992 Ricin and lentil
lectin affinity chromatography reveals oligosaccharide heterogeneity
of thyrotropin secreted by 12 human pituitary tumors. Metabolism.
41:1009-1015.
Androgen
Deficiency and It's Therapy in HIV-Infected Men
Steve Grinspoon, M.D..
Among men with HIV disease, gonadal
dysfunction is highly prevalent. In early studies, over half of
all men with AIDS demonstrated low testosterone levels. The prevalence
of hypogonadism increases with severity of illness, and is most
often associated with normal gonadotropin levels in 75% of cases.
Potential mechanisms of secondary hypogonadism in HIV-infected men
include undernutrition and chronic illness which may reduce GnRH
pulsatility, inducing a state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
In addition, medications are a potential cause of secondary hypogonadism
in this population. Megestrol acetate, a synthetic progestational
agent, may result in profound hypogonadism in treated patients.
More rarely, mass lesions of the pituitary and hypothalamus are
seen and may represent opportunistic infections, such as toxoplasmosis
or HIV-related malignancies, including lymphoma. Primary hypogonadism
is often idiopathic, but may also be related to opportunistic infection
or malignancy. More recent data suggest a lower prevalence of 25%
for hypogonadism among HIV-infected men with advanced HIV disease.
However, hypogonadism remains prevalent among HIV-infected men,
even in the era of highly active antiviral therapy or HAART.
The diagnosis of hypogonadism is
best made by determination of the serum free or bioavailable testosterone
levels, because of increased SHBG levels in HIV disease. Measurement
of gonadotropin levels is useful to differentiate primary from
secondary hypogonadism, and in secondary hypogonadism, gonadotropins
will be inappropriately low or normal in the setting of low testosterone
levels. Imaging of the hypothalamus and pituitary glands is recommended
in the setting of headache, visual changes or in association with
other signs and symptoms of pituitary disease.
The sequelae of hypogonadism among
HIV-infected patients include decreased muscle mass and functional
capacity, fatigue and reduced quality of life. Decreased lean
body mass is a significant predictor of increased mortality and
reduced survival among HIV-infected patients and is therefore
an important clinical endpoint in this population. Among men with
AIDS wasting, testosterone levels are highly correlated with lean
body mass. Furthermore, such patients demonstrate a disproportionate
loss of muscle mass, in comparison to weight. Importantly, significant
loss of muscle mass or sarcopenia is seen even among stable, protease
inhibitor-treated patients, in whom there is a direct correlation
between muscle mass and functional status.
The effects of testosterone administration
in hypogonadal HIV-infected men were recently investigated. In
a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, testosterone was administered
at 300 mg intramuscularly every 3 weeks for 6 months. Muscle and
lean body mass increased significantly in the testosterone-treated
relative to the placebo-treated patients by approximately 3 kg
(Figure 1). Importantly, patients reported a subjective benefit
with respect to improved overall quality of life, appearance and
well being. The testosterone was well tolerated and without adverse
effects. The relative change in lean body mass in response to
testosterone is equivalent to or greater than that of other anabolic
agents used in the AIDS wasting syndrome, including growth hormone.
The use of physiologic testosterone administration (200-300 mg
IM q 2-3 weeks) for hypogonadal HIV-infected men is now routine,
and all such patients, particularly men with the wasting syndrome,
should be screened and treated for hypogonadism when appropriate.
Transdermal delivery of testosterone
is now an alternative to intramuscular dosing for HIV-infected
patients. Two such transdermal products, Androderm (r) and Testoderm
(r) are now commercially available, each with a recommended dose
of 5 mg/day. Bhasin et al. recently showed a beneficial effect
of transdermal testosterone administration (5 mg/day) to significantly
increase lean body mass by 1.4 kg over 3 months in hypogonadal
men with HIV infection. Potential advantages of transdermal dosing
include more stable, steady state testosterone levels. However,
further studies are necessary to insure that mean testosterone
levels are sufficient in response to transdermal dosing. At the
current time, either transdermal or IM therapy is recommended
for hypogonadal men with HIV-infection. However, it is recommended
that serum testosterone levels be checked at least once after
initiation of transdermal therapy to insure adequate levels within
the normal range.
A commonly asked question regarding
testosterone administration in HIV-infected men is the appropriate
duration of therapy. A sustained anabolic effect of testosterone
administration on lean body mass of 3.7 kg or 7.6% over 12 months
was previously demonstrated. No adverse effects on the prostate
or PSA were seen and hematocrit increased 3.5% over this time
period. These data suggest that continuation of testosterone for
at least one year is beneficial and results in sustained increases
in lean body mass. Serial monitoring of the prostate is important
with long-term testosterone administration. Among patients who
have achieved stable weight and are less ill, discontinuation
of testosterone and reassessment of gonadal function is appropriate,
as androgen levels may improve with nutritional and immunologic
recovery.
An important question is the efficacy
of androgen therapy in eugonadal men with the wasting syndrome.
At the current time, such supraphysiologic dosing cannot be endorsed
because of the potential risks related to prostate, mood and acne.
However, studies performed under carefully controlled conditions
and with appropriate monitoring are now underway to determine
the efficacy of larger dose of testosterone in HIV-infected patients.
A final question concerns the role of exercise therapy, in combination
with anabolic therapy, to increase functional status in HIV-infected
men. Data in non HIV-infected men suggest an additive effect of
combined androgen and exercise therapy, but combined anabolic
strategies have not been previously studied among men with AIDS
wasting.
In summary, recent data suggest
that hypogonadism remains an important clinical problem among
HIV-infected men, even in the setting of potent antiviral agents.
Hypogonadism in HIV-infected men is most often associated with
low or inappropriately normal gonadotropin levels but is not often
associated with a sellar mass lesion. Recent studies suggest a
potent and sustained benefit of androgen therapy to reverse significant
underlying muscle loss in hypogonadal HIV-infected men. At the
current time, HIV infected patients with evidence of weight loss
or muscle weakness and/or clinical symptoms of hypogonadism should
be screened and treated for hypogonadism. The use of testosterone
to increase lean body mass in eugonadal patients, must be considered
experimental until further data are obtained.
Figure Legend: Mean changeńSEM
for fat-free mass assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry,
lean body mass determined from potassium-40 isotope analysis,
and muscle mass from urinary creatinine excretion in patients
who received testosterone (left) and placebo (right) over 6 months.
* P<0.05 and **P<0.01 for the change from baseline between the
testosterone group and the placebo group by analysis of covariance.
n="number" of patients for whom paired end of study data are available.
Reprinted from Reference 5 (below) with permission of the American
College of Physicians.
References:
1. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Asbel-Sethi
N, et al. 1998 Effects of testosterone replacement with a nongenital,
transdermal system, Androderm, in human immunodeficiency-virus
infected men with low testosterone levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
83:3155-3162.
2. Dobs AS, Dempsey MA, Ladenson PW, and Polk BF. 1988 Endocrine
disorders in men infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Am
J Med. 84:611-6.
3. Grinspoon SK and Bilezikian JB. 1992 HIV disease and the endocrine
system. N Engl J Med. 327:1360-1365.
4. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Lee K, et al. 1996 Loss of lean body
mass and muscle mass correlates with androgen levels in hypogonadal
men with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and wasting. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 81:4051-4058.
5. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Askari H, et al. 1998 Effects of androgen
administration in men with aids wasting: a randomized, placebo-controlled,
trial. Ann Int Med. 129:18-26.
6. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Anderson E, Hubbard J, Basgoz N, and
Klibanski A. 1998 Sustained anabolic effects of long-term androgen
administration in men with AIDS wasting. Clin Inf Dis. In press.
Neuroendocrine
& Pituitary Center | Referrals
Neuroendocrine
Bulletin Archive | Guestbook
| Neurosurgery Home
| Links
|