
Welcome to the Particles NewsLetter Web Site
Issue: Number
23 January 1999
Editor: Janet Sisterson
Ph.D., NPTC
|
Introduction
| Facilities | Patients
| HCL HomePage
Introduction
Mailing Lists:
I have completed updating the mailing list. I thank everyone who
returned the forms to me.
Costs: At
PTCOG XIX, the Steering Committee decided that part of the registration
fee for PTCOG meetings would be used to help produce both Particles
and the abstracts of the PTCOG meetings. Only part of the costs
are covered in this way, so more financial help is needed from the
community. PTCOG is always happy to receive financial gifts; all
such gifts are deductible as charitable contributions for federal
income tax purposes. The appropriate method is to send a check made
out to the "Massachusetts General Hospital" and sent to
Janet Sisterson at the address given below. We thank the
organizers of PTCOG XXVII, Chiba, Japan for their generous contribution
over and above the designated amount normally due to PTCOG for the
support of Particles.
Facility and
Patient Statistics: I continue to collect information about
all operating or proposed facilities. Please send me your information.
A recent published summary of the world wide patient statistics
with detailed patient data through 1994 can be found in the following
reference. "Proton therapy in 1996." J. M. Sisterson,
CP392, Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, eds.
J. L. Duggan and I. L. Morgan, AIP Press, New York (1997), p1261-4.
A new summary with patient data through 1997, "World wide proton
therapy experience in 1997" is accepted for publication in
the proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on the Application
of Accelerators in Research and Industry. The publication date is
expected to be April 1999.
Particles on
the Internet: The URL for the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory is:-
- http://neurosurgery.mgh.harvard.edu/hcl/
or http://brain.mgh.harvard.edu:100/hcl
This contains links
to recent issues of Particles.
Other proton
therapy links:
- Northeast Proton
Therapy Center: http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/depts/nptc/nptc.htm
- LLUMC, California:
http://www.llu.edu/proton
- U of California,
Davis: http://crocker.ucdavis.edu/cnl/research/eyet.htm
- Midwest Proton
Radiation Institute: http://nike.iucf.indiana.edu/ptherapy/
- TRIUMF, Canada
protons: http://www.triumf.ca/welcome/proton_thrpy.html
- TRIUMF, Canada
pions: http://www.triumf.ca/welcome/pion_trtmt.html
- NAC, South Africa:
http://www.medrad.nac.ac.za/
- PSI, Switzerland:
http://www.psi.ch/
- Proton Oncological
Therapy, Project of the ISS, Italy: http://top.iss.infn.it
- TERA foundation,
Italy: http://www.tera.it
- Tsukuba, Japan:
http://www-medical.kek.jp/index.html
- Tsukuba, Japan
- new facility plans: http://www-medical.kek.jp/devnewfac.html
- HIMAC, Chiba,
Japan: http://www.nirs.go.jp/ENG/particl.htm (ENG case sensitive)
- National Association
for Proton Therapy: http://www.proton-therapy.org/
- Prolit - database
of particle radiation therapy: http://proton.llu.edu
- GSI homepage:
http://www.gsi.de
- The Svedborg
Laboratory, Sweden: http://www.tsl.uu.se/
ARTICLES FOR PARTICLES
24
May 30 1999 is
the deadline for news for Particles 24, the July 1999 issue. I will
send reminders by fax or e-mail.
Please note that
I have moved from the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory to the Northeast
Proton Therapy Center at Massachusetts General Hospital. Address
all correspondence for the newsletter to:
Janet Sisterson
Ph.D. Telephone: (617) 724-1942
Northeast Proton
Therapy Center Fax: (617) 724-9532
Massachusetts General
Hospital E-mail: jsisterson@partners.org
Boston MA 02114
Articles for the
newsletter can be short but should NOT exceed two pages in
length. The best way to send an article is by computer. If
you mail or fax an article, remember that I scan them into the computer
so I need a good clean copy of any figures.
PLEASE,
when you send me a file by computer GIVE IT AN UNIQUE TITLE
that will indicate to me the source of the article. You have no
idea how many files I have on my computer that are called ptles23.doc
or something similar!!
PTCOG and FUTURE
PTCOG MEETINGS
|
Chair:
Michael Goitein
|
Secretary:
Janet Sisterson
|
|
Department
of Radiation Oncology
Massachusetts
General Hospital
Boston
MA 02114
|
Northeast
Proton Therapy Center
Massachusetts
General Hospital
Boston
MA 02114
|
The
PTCOG e-mail address is PTCOG@radonc.mgh.harvard.edu
Steering Committee
Members
|
USA
|
Europe
|
Russia
|
Japan
|
South Africa
|
|
W. Chu
|
U. Amaldi
|
V. Khoroshkov
|
K. Kawachi
|
D. Jones
|
|
M. Goitein
|
H. Blattmann
|
|
H. Tsujii
|
|
|
D. Miller
|
J.-L. Habrand
|
|
|
|
|
J. Sisterson
|
G. Munkel
|
|
|
|
|
James Slater
|
E. Pedroni
|
|
|
|
|
A. Smith
|
A. Wambersie
|
|
|
|
|
H. D. Suit
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Verhey
|
|
|
|
|
The times and locations
of the next PTCOG meetings are as follows:-
|
PTCOG XXX
|
NAC, Cape
Town, South Africa
|
April 12
- 15 1999
|
|
PTCOG XXXI
|
Bloomington,
IN, USA
|
October
11 - 13 1999
|
|
PTCOG XXXII
|
Uppsala,
Sweden
|
May/June
2000
|
COMBINED
MEETING - PTCOG XXX / EHTG / ECHED
12-15
April 1999
PTCOG
Proton Therapy Co-Operative Group
EHTG
European Hadron Therapy Group
ECHED
European Clinical Heavy Particle Dosimetry Group
Date:
12-15 APRIL 1999
Venue:
MÖVENPICK ARTHUR'S SEAT HOTEL
SEA POINT, CAPE TOWN
SOUTH AFRICA
Organisers:
Medical Radiation Group Contact:
National Accelerator Centre Dr. Dan Jones
P O Box 72 Tel: +27-21-843-3820
Faure Fax: +27-21-843-3382
7131 SOUTH AFRICA e-mail: jones@nac.ac.za
Latest
Information: http://www.medrad.nac.ac.za/events.htm.
Full information
with registration information was mailed in December to all those
on the Particles mailing list as of October 1998. If you did not
get the documentation, or require additional copies please contact
Dan Jones by one of the means given above.
************
ERRATUM ************
KRUGER
NATIONAL PARK TOURS
Regrettably
GM Taylor Tours can no longer offer the tour to the Kruger National
Park as specified in the mailed PTCOGXXX/EHTG/ECHED Meeting announcement.
Talk Travel (the official travel agent for the Meeting) can however,
offer a wide selection of Kruger National Park (and other) tours.
Please contact Carol at Talk Travel, the correct phone and fax numbers
are below.:
Tel:
+27-21-797-1861
Fax:
+27-21-797-7810
e-mail:
CarolJ.talk@galileo.sa.co.za
NB.
The fax number for Talk Travel in the mailed announcement was
incorrect.
*************************
Program:
The meeting will cover all aspects of neutron capture, fast neutron,
proton and heavy ion therapy. Eros Pedroni, who will chair the focus
session on "patient motion and positioning", asks for
your help in organizing this session. See his announcement below.
Cape Town is regarded
as one of the world's most beautiful cities and April is a very
pleasant time of the year - the average maximum temperature is 23°C/73°F
and the average minimum temperature is 12°C/54°F. The Arthur's Seat
Hotel is conveniently located in the suburb of Sea Point and is
one block from the seafront. Downtown is easily accessible as the
hotel is on the main bus and taxi routes and there is also a shuttle
bus to the Waterfront shopping, hospitality and entertainment complex.
Cape Town is easily reached from all major cities, either on South
African Airways or on other international carriers. Flights terminate
in Cape Town or Johannesburg, which is a 2-hour flight from Cape
Town.
Announcement:
FOCUS SESSION ON
"PATIENT MOTION AND POSITIONING"
Dear colleagues,
I received the
task to organize and chair this session and I need therefore your
help.
We should try to
put together our present knowledge on these important topics. Here
are just a few examples of possible contributions to the session:
- How much do
we know quantitatively about organ motion (for example using dual
CT images, with inspiration and expiration)?
- How much of
it is taken into account in treatment planning (safety margins,
acceptable homogeneity of the dose, quantification of the dose
errors due to organ motion)?
- Discussion of
the sensitivity of the different beam delivery techniques: more
critical for scanning than for scattering.
- Strategies to
cope with organ motion in the beam delivery: multiple painting
of the dose, choice of the beam size allowable for scanning
- Methods to reduce
organ motion: synchronization with phase of breathing, external
active breathing techniques, ventral compression ?
- Misalignment
of density heterogeneities due to organ movements and resultant
wrong compensation of the range
- Check of patient
immobilization during treatment using external or internal sensors:
for example distance sensors, stereotactic cameras, ultrasound,
implanted magnetic dipoles.
- Automated patient
positioning setup: prior to treatment and during treatment
- Active correction
of target movements with the beam (tumor tracking) ?
- and whatever
else you think fits the subject.
Organ motion is
probably one of the most important obstacles to precision radiotherapy
in general. I expect therefore a strong interest in this topic and
numerous contributions.
Anyone coming to
the next PTCOG meeting and willing to give a presentation for this
session, is invited to announce his contribution either to me (pedroni@psi.ch)
or to the local organizing committee.
E. Pedroni, PSI,
Switzerland.
FIRST
ANNOUNCEMENT:
PTCOG
XXXI
Bloomington,
IN USA
October
11 - 13, 1999
Venue: Indiana
University Campus
Indiana Memorial
Union
Bloomington, IN
Organizers:
Indiana University Cyclotron Facility (IUCF)
2401 Milo B. Sampson
Ln.
Bloomington, IN
47408
Contact: Dr. Susan
B. Klein
Tel: (812) 856-4405
Fax: (812) 855-6645
e-mail: sklein@iucf.indiana.edu
Latest Information:
http://www.iucf.indiana.edu
Agenda:
- Clinical results
- New treatment
protocols
- New facilities
- Accelerator
developments
- Beam delivery
systems
- Dosimetry
- Quality assurance
- Radiobiology
- Treatment planning
Bloomington, Indiana
is the heart of mid-western United States. The Indiana University
campus has been rated as one of the five most beautiful campuses
in the United States by Thomas A. Gaines in his book, The Campus
as a Work of Art. IU Bloomington, is applauded internationally for
its musical arts program. The IU School of Music, one of the world's
top-ranked music schools, offers more than 1,000 performances each
year.
October is by far
the most pleasant time of the year. Temperatures generally remain
around 13C/60o F until late in the month, and this part
of the country is renowned for its beautiful autumn colors. Bloomington
is an hour's drive south of Indianapolis, where the airport is located.
Hotel accommodations
will be available at the conference site, and also at other locations
within Bloomington. Nothing is beyond walking distance, if you have
comfortable shoes and sufficient time, but motorized transportation
will be available. Detailed information will be announced in the
next Particles Newsletter, and located on the "latest information"
web site noted above.
PROLIT: Culling
The Heavy-Particle Radiation Therapy Literature
I am repeating
this article from Particles 22, so that the many people who have
asked me about a bibliography can have a better answer than the
one I have been giving.
Prolit,
a database of Medline abstracts related to particle radiation therapy,
is now available on the Loma Linda Proton Treatment Center Web pages
(http://proton.llu.edu). The database provides access to over 5000
particle therapy abstracts, enabling physicians, patients, and researchers
to begin their search for information in one convenient site on
the Web. A full description of Prolit is available on the Web site.
The database will be updated regularly.
The first Prolit
database was developed at LLUMC in the late 1980s; it was distributed
to PTCOG members and others interested in particle radiation therapy
via hard copy and diskettes. Prolit was discontinued in 1993, when
it became apparent that the data-collection process was too labor-intensive
and the mode of distribution limited. The current incarnation of
Prolit can be updated quickly, and should reach a much larger audience
via the Internet.
The Prolit development
team anticipates refining the search engine and PubMed search strategy
based on user feedback. Please direct any comments to Robert Kirby
at rkirby@dominion.llumc.edu. Robert Kirby, Dept. of Radiation
Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street,
Loma Linda, CA 92354.
Borje Larsson
1931
1998
There
is a picture of Borje in the paper version of Particles
With
sadness we have to record the death of Borje Larsson last November.
There can hardly be a member of the particle therapy community whose
life was not in some way touched by him. We have all listened to
him as, over the years, he publicly articulated his always broad
vision of the possibilities for exploiting what was known, and gaining
new knowledge. In his sweeping surveys of whatever topic he was
asked to speak about, he was never less than enthusiastic; the time
allocated to him was never enough. Our community will be a duller
one in his absence.
Borje was a pioneer.
The proton therapy program which he, with others, initiated in Uppsala
was the first systematic investigation of the use of protons for
cancer therapy. His doctoral dissertation of 1962, aptly subtitled
"a biophysical study," describes a series of investigations
which were comprehensive in their coverage of physical, radiobiological
and clinical issues.
Borje had a broad
vision. Rarely could one discuss something with him without his
introducing new issues of relevance or having him allude to experiences
in widely dispersed fields which might have some bearing on the
problem at hand. His own work covered several fields and employed
many technologies. He saw the future as though it were just around
the corner. Years and, indeed, decades before they were generally
appreciated, he saw synergies between disparate areas of knowledge.
Borje had humor.
He was rarely without a smile on his face. He saw the lighter side
of the issues he dealt with; even, perhaps especially, those he
cared most about. On a 1983 visit to the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory,
Borje gave a lecture during which he stepped before the audience,
whipped out his electronic flash camera, and proceeded to take three
photos of the audience to make a sort of panorama. He made some
remark about now being able to say who attended his lecture. Such
whimsy was typical of him.
Borje was deeply
curious. To take a walk outdoors with him was to enter into a continuum
of speculation about the world around one. What was the name of
that flower and in what climates could it flourish? What could explain
the detailed knowledge implicit in the migratory behavior of that
bird? What was the chemistry behind the fallen leaves below the
maples which bordered the path? No problem was too small or too
exotic to fail to elicit his attention and wonderment.
Borje was an internationalist.
Besides holding Professorships in two countries, and participating
in scientific conferences on probably all continents, he enthusiastically
supported programs in the then Soviet Union and in Thailand. These
programs were important in supporting the work and development of
established and upcoming scientists in those countries. Amongst
several positions and honors, Borje was President of the International
Society for Neutron Capture Therapy, organized their 7th
International Symposium and received their first Hatanaka award;
and, in recognition, amongst other things, of his role in developing
the original gamma knife, he received the first Fabrikant award
from the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society.
Borje was ingenious.
As an example, he conceived and began the development of a so-called
Compact Cell Culture Disc (CCCD). This is a specially prepared CD
with a large number of "micropits" into which single cells
can be deposited for example, by a fast cell sorter
and then rapidly and automatically individually analyzed for their
clonogenic or other characteristics. He thought this device could
add a new dimension to what can be learned from the traditional
cell-visualization techniques of pathology.
Borje was enthusiastic.
He had a particular way of pronouncing the word "fascinating"
- and it was never far from his lips. His excitement about his work
and, even more, the work of others, was clearly evident and it was
infectious. His energy and optimism could raise the mood of even
the most exhausted companion.
Borje was a most
generous and warm-hearted man. He thought well about everybody;
he looked for the good in all. In going to Zurich to head the Institute
for Medical Radiobiology he had the most generous of motivations:
to support, encourage and help the investigators there, young and
old, to achieve their highest potential. This he did with the utmost
selflessness. And, when the University of Zurich elected to change
the Institute's direction, he accepted this decision with noteworthy
good grace and provided his successor with his fullest support.
Borje was a courageous
truth-seeker. In the 1980's he proposed a series of popular books
in natural science. Together with Sven Kullander he wrote "Mikrokosmos"
and, more recently, "Out of Sight." Mikrokosmos and its
authors were criticized severely and very publicly for the non-alarmist
position they took on the after-effects of the Chernobyl accident.
Borje never yielded to this criticism and was unfailingly
honest and clear about the issues and what he felt to be the status
of scientific knowledge in this matter.
Borje was a family
man. He and his wife, Inga-Lis, met and married during their student
days. Their harmony was evident for all to see. With his son, Jonas,
his daughter, Anneka, and his eight grandchildren, he was blessed
with a close and sustaining family life.
Borje was an enormous
friend to many of us. We miss him.
Michael
Goitein
Jorgen Carlsson
Nigel Crompton
Gudrun Goitein
Andy Koehler
Sven Kullander
PTCOG Information/News/Reports:
The following reports
and articles were received by January 1999.
Status Report:
Heavy Ion Therapy at GSI, Darmstadt, Germany:
After a machine
shut down of six months, two therapy blocks of 4 weeks each were
available from August 12 to September 12 and from October
23 to November 23. In each therapy block 9 patients have been treated,
suffering from chordomas, chondrosarcomas and adenocystic carcinomas.
Half of the patients received all fractions with carbon beam only,
the other half had a carbon boost of at least 5 fractions combined
with precision photon treatment.
The tumors were
mostly located in the base of the skull. One patient having a chordoma
in the pelvic region was treated also. Target volumes up to 300
ccm were dissected into range layers of 2 mm thickness resulting
in up to 120 isoenergy slices and up to 20,000 treatment pixels.
Major problems
at the beginning of each patient treatment period resulted from
the many changes in the accelerator system and the beam line reconstruction.
It took always a few days to obtain a stable beam having less than
1mm dislocation at the target point for all 250 energies between
88 and 430 MeV/u and the different intensity steps and beam diameters.
When the stability
conditions were fulfilled the irradiation could be performed without
major problems over the complete time course. For the second patient
treatment period there were only a few hours of interruption mainly
caused by defects in the oldest part of the accelerator system,
the Alvarez tanks.
In such cases of
longer interruptions the patients were released from their fixation
mask and realigned after the problems were fixed. The treatment
started at the same pixel at the same range layer and lateral position
as it was stopped before.
The intensity and
the spatial limits for each pixel were very narrow: in lateral position
an error of 50 % of the half width and +/- 50 % in calculated intensity
were allowed for a single pixel. Only a few interrupts occurred
during irradiation mostly because of intensity fluctuations rather
than because of lateral errors. The total agreement between planning
volume and irradiated volume could be also tested using the positron
emitting nuclides mainly 11C and 10 C. The
decay of these isotopes was monitored online by means of a PET camera.
The comparison of planning contours and PET reconstruction were
very useful and agreement within 2-3 mm was found which is the spatial
resolution of the PET camera.
However in some
cases the PET image was influenced by biological effects as for
instance the fast wash out of C isotopes from soft tissue. For bones
these wash out effects were not observed. This yields a biology
weighted PET image depending on time after irradiation.
Another difference
was found in measured and planned particle ranges when mixed"
tissues are traversed by the beam: Volume elements consisting of
bones and soft tissues showed Hounsfield numbers that represent
an average of both tissues but do not reflect the local tissue density
that is responsible for the energy loss of the beam, because range
correction are based on CT images. Therefore calibration-experiments
with fresh animal tissues have been carried out and animal experiments
are in preparation.
During treatment
these inaccuracies of the range correction were not expected to
cause problems, because entrance channels were selected in such
a way that possible range overshoots would not be directed towards
critical organs.
For treatment planning
the Voxelplan program was used in combination with TRIP that takes
into account particle fragmentation as well as local variations
in RBE.
The physical dose
distribution (absorbed dose) could be verified in phantom irradiations
and the distal fall off by PET analysis. For the RBE verifications
the response of tumors and healthy tissue has to be waited for.
Up to now no effects in the patients treated with carbon alone have
been observed. Analysis of the first two patients treated in December
last year yielded an unexpected fast tumor regression although these
patients received a boost of 5 fractions with carbon ions only.
As a general conclusion
it can be stated that the treatment of the first twenty patients
with the intensity controlled rasterscan system went extremely well
concerning the reliability of the accelerator, the precision of
the dose distribution and online PET verification and also in the
interplay of the four institutions at Darmstadt, Heidelberg and
Dresden. This success supports the desire for a dedicated therapy
machine, where carbon beam for treatment is available every day
through out the year.
A proposal of a
heavy ion treatment facility to be installed at Heidelberg has been
completed and handed over to the minister for science and technology
at an inauguration ceremony of the Heavy Ion Therapy at GSI at September
16 that was held in the connection with PTCOG meeting at Heidelberg.
(This proposal written in English is available on request.) For
the next year, three patient treatment periods are scheduled between
February and end of September. Gerhard Kraft, GSI, Planckstr.
1, Darmstadt D 64291, Germany.
An Update from
IUCF, Bloomington, Indiana:
INTRODUCTION:
In 1996, a consortium of physicians and scientists throughout the
Midwest collaborated to form the Midwest Proton Radiation Institute
(MPRI) consortium. MPRI is an independent radiation therapy center
which will be operated as a regional facility in association with
physicians and scientists at a number of radiation oncology practices
within a 300-mile radius of the institute. MPRI will be operated
by one or more existing organizations which already operate radiation
oncology facilities. The medical facility will purchase proton beam
from the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility (IUCF). IUCF has
two operational accelerators suitable for proton therapy: a 210
MeV cyclotron, and a 240 MeV synchrotron. The cyclotron is currently
available and the synchrotron could be available for expansion.
FACILITY DESCRIPTION:
A conceptual design for the proton therapy facility has been completed
which utilizes the existing cyclotrons and their experimental facilities
space, as well as much of the existing beam line equipment and services.
The Main Cyclotron, which can deliver over one micro-amp of protons
at 210 MeV, will be operated as a fixed energy machine at its maximum
energy. The main beam line from the cyclotron will be reconfigured
for fast switching between the treatment rooms and the other research
activities, and equipped with a new control system. In addition
to the eye-line there are four new rooms planned, each with their
own energy selection system: a fixed horizontal beam line, two gantries
and a research/radiation effects room. An adjoining clinical facility
will be constructed to house treatment planning, patient care and
staff support facilities. A schematic layout of the MPRI facility
is shown in Figure 1.
Missing Picture
CURRENT STATUS:
MPRI has been granted one million dollars through a VA/HUD economic
development initiative. The past year has been occupied with developing
the clinical specifications and with the conceptual design of the
facility to meet these specifications. The preliminary beam line
design for beam transport and energy selection from the Cyclotron
to the proposed treatment rooms was reviewed on December 4, 1998.
Decommissioning of the cyclotron's nuclear physics experimental
areas has begun, with the intention of keeping the eye-line operational
as long as possible during the facility renovation. Planning is
underway for upgrades to the accelerator systems to insure their
long-term reliability.
PATIENT TREATMENT:
The first AMD patient was treated at the Indiana University Cyclotron
Facility on July 27, 1998. We have since treated a total of eight
patients for a clinical trial evaluating proton therapy for the
choroidal neovascular membrane in age-related macular degeneration.
This study is being carried out in collaboration with the Department
of Ophthalmology at the IU Medical School, the IU School of Optometry,
and radiation oncologists from Methodist and IU Hospitals. The clinical
trial is designed to be a randomized, double-blinded, controlled
trial of patients who have been recently diagnosed with AMD and
who are not candidates for conventional laser coagulation therapy.
The treatment consists of a total dose of 16 Gy delivered in two
equal fractions on consecutive days. The patient accrual rate has
been steady, but not as high as the physicians expected.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
We have benefited from advice and assistance from many physicists
and radiation oncologists in refining our plans. In particular,
we acknowledge and thank members of the Harvard Cyclotron Facility,
Loma Linda University Medical Center and the Northeast Proton Therapy
Center. We have greatly benefited from advice from Dr. A. Mazal,
C.P.O. and Dr. A. Thornton, M.G.H. Finally, we owe a great debt
to the various members of our consortium and technical advisory
boards who have given us much excellent counsel. G. P. Berg, C.
Bloch, J. M. Cameron, S. B. Klein, M. K. Wedekind, Indiana University
Cyclotron Facility, 2401 Milo B Sampson Ln, Bloomington, Indiana
47408.
The first treatment
periods at the Berlin Eye Treatment Facility:
As reported earlier,
the Berlin Eye Treatment Facility at the Hahn-Meitner Institute
(HMI) started patient treatments in June 1998. Besides the experimental
physics work at the accelerator department, patient treatments are
now scheduled during one week per month. After seven therapy periods,
30 patients have been treated up to December 1998. The following
eye diseases were treated:
- 21 choroidal
melanomas
- 6 hemangiomas
- 2 iris melanoma
- 1 retinal angioma
Patient's ages
varied from 10 to 85 years. Fractionation schedules of 60 CGE and
20 CGE delivered in 4 fractions on 4 days were applied for melanoma
and hemangioma patients, respectively. The patients are prepared
and treated in a close collaboration between ophthalmologists and
radiation oncologists from university hospitals in Berlin and Essen
where the patients are being prepared for the proton therapy (Ta
clip surgery). For all treatment planning, EYEPLAN was used. Eye
modeling and tumor localisation was assisted in most cases with
CT and high-resolution MRT data. Treatment times could be reduced
due to the new technical features of the HMI eye treatment beam
line (X-ray image intensifiers, image processing of X-ray pictures
and data link to the treatment chair). For the 2nd to 4th irradiations,
a patient treatment generally took not longer than 12 minutes including
patient preparation and positioning procedure.
A follow-up of
the first patient after 4 month revealed first signs for an overall
tumor regression, no side effects and an increased visual acuity
compared to the last measurements before the treatment in June.
Juergen Heese, Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin GmbH, Abt. Ionenstrahltechniken/Augentumortherapie,
Glienicker Str. 100, D-14109 Berlin, Germany.
PSI Spot
Scanning Gantry: Review of the first beam periods for patient
treatments:
After a first human
patient treatment in November 1996, two beam periods of five months
each allowed for the irradiation of 19 more patients in 1997/98.
The treated lesions were located within the brain, retroperitoneum,
sacral area, shoulder and orbita, target volumes varied between
30 and 3900 cc. Histologies were selected gliomas, meningiomas,
sarcomas, chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skullbase, chordomas
of the sacrum, and two selected metastases. Out of 20 treatments,
four were boost treatments or planned photon-proton combinations.
Four patients received palliative therapy, though this will not
be a main program in the future.
All treatments
were well tolerated, medically as well as with respect to the logistics
of the new therapy installation. None of the patients with brain
tumors required steroid medication. During the short follow up period,
no tumor progression was seen or reported. One patient suffers from
grade 2 reaction of the rectal mucosa, in an area where the tumor
was directly attached to the rectal wall. All other patients are
free from treatment related toxicity.
Proton radiation
therapy with spot scanning protons on the PSI gantry has been successful
in two beam periods. Longer follow up time, increasing experience
and improved logistics will be basis for further patient treatments
within defined programs and protocols in close collaboration with
the Swiss Proton Users Group and referring centers and doctors.
G. Goitein, L. Wisser, A. Lomax, E. Pedroni, Team Radiation Medicine,
Division of Radiation Medicine, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH - 5232
Villigen PSI.
First patient treatment
at the National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan:
The year of 1998
is commemorative for the National Cancer Center (NCC), JAPAN. The
Project of Proton Treatment Facility of NCC, Kashiwa started in
April 1996, when the building construction and machine manufacturing
initiated. These construction and manufacturing completed in March
1997. Adjustments and tests of all the equipments have begun from
April 1997. In November 1997, we had the pleasure to show our new
facility to the participants of PTCOG XXVII meeting held at the
National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Chiba.
In February 1998,
first proton beam was extracted from the cyclotron, and in March,
beam tests have been started at gantry #2. Biological experiments
to determine RBE were performed, in collaboration with NIRS, in
May and June. After that, we have improved some hardwares and softwares
of our proton therapy system until October. On November 24, 1998,
first proton beam irradiation to a human was carried out. The first
patient is a male with carcinoma of the maxillary sinus. We had
made a 2 beams treatment planning for the patient at gantry #2.
The system for patient set-up with real-time digital radiography
worked very well. It is planned in our initial protocol for the
head & neck malignancies to treat 2.5 GyE x 26 fr., total of
65 GyE by proton therapy alone. Takashi Ogino, M.D., Div. of
Radiation Oncology,National Cancer Center Hospital East 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha,
Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, JAPAN
Proposed
NEW FACILITIES for PROTON & ION BEAM THERAPY
January
1999
|
INSTITUTION
|
PLACE
|
TYPE
|
1ST
RX?
|
COMMENTS
|
|
NPTC (Harvard)
|
MA USA
|
p
|
1999
|
at MGH; 235
MeV cyclotron; 2 gantries + 3 horiz.
|
|
INFN-LNS,
Catania
|
Italy
|
p
|
1999
|
70 MeV; 1
room, fixed horiz. beam
|
|
Hyogo
|
Japan
|
p,
ion
|
2001
|
2 gantries;
2 horiz; 1 vert; 1 45 deg;under construction
|
|
NAC, Faure
|
South Africa
|
p
|
2001
|
new treatment
room with beam line 30o off vertical.
|
|
Tsukuba
|
Japan
|
p
|
2001
|
270 MeV;
2 gantries; 1 research room; funded
|
|
CGMH, Northern
Taiwan
|
Taiwan
|
p
|
2001?
|
250MeV synchrotron
or 230Mev cyclotron;3 gantry,1 fixed
|
|
Wakasa Bay
|
Japan
|
|
2002
|
multipurpose
accelerator; building completed mid 1998
|
|
Bratislava
|
Slovakia
|
p,
ion
|
2003
|
72 MeV cyclotron;
p; ions; +BNCT, isot prod.
|
|
Shizuoka
Cancer Center
|
Japan
|
|
2002?
|
synchrotron
230? MeV; 2 gantries; 1 horiz; funded.
|
|
Erlangen
|
Germany
|
p
|
2002?
|
4 treatment
rooms, some with gantries.
|
|
CNAO, Milan
& Pavia
|
Italy
|
p,
ion
|
2004?
|
synchrotron;
2 gantry;1 fixed beam rooms;1 exp. room
|
|
AUSTRON
|
Austria
|
p,
ion
|
?
|
2p gantry;1
ion gantry;1 fixed p;1 fixed ion;1 exp room
|
|
Beijing
|
China
|
p
|
?
|
250 MeV synchrotron.
|
|
Central Italy
|
Italy
|
p
|
?
|
cyclotron;
1 gantry; 1 fixed
|
|
Clatterbridge
|
England
|
p
|
?
|
upgrade using
booster linear accelerator to 200 MeV?
|
|
TOP project
ISS Rome
|
Italy
|
p
|
?
|
70 MeV linac;
expand to 200 MeV?
|
|
3 projects
in Moscow
|
Russia
|
p
|
?
|
|
|
HIRFL,Lanzhou
|
PR China
|
C
ion
|
?
|
|
|
Krakow
|
Poland
|
p
|
?
|
60 MeV proton
beam.
|
|
Moscow
|
Russia
|
p
|
?
|
320 MeV;
compact, probably no gantry
|
|
Proton Development
N.A. Inc.
|
IL USA
|
p
|
?
|
300 MeV protons;
therapy & lithography
|
WORLD
WIDE CHARGED PARTICLE PATIENT TOTALS
January 1999
|
WHO
|
WHERE
|
WHAT
|
DATE
|
DATE
|
RECENT
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST
|
LAST
|
PATIENT
|
OF
|
|
|
|
|
RX
|
RX
|
TOTAL
|
TOTAL
|
|
Berkeley
184
|
CA. USA
|
p
|
1954
|
1957
|
30
|
|
|
Berkeley
|
CA. USA
|
He
|
1957
|
1992
|
2054
|
June-91
|
|
Uppsala
|
Sweden
|
p
|
1957
|
1976
|
73
|
|
|
Harvard
|
MA. USA
|
p
|
1961
|
|
7942
|
Dec-98
|
|
Dubna
|
Russia
|
p
|
1967
|
1974
|
84
|
|
|
Moscow
|
Russia
|
p
|
1969
|
|
3100
|
Dec-98
|
|
Los Alamos
|
NM. USA
|
p-
|
1974
|
1982
|
230
|
|
|
St. Petersburg
|
Russia
|
p
|
1975
|
|
1029
|
Jun-98
|
|
Berkeley
|
CA. USA
|
heavy ion
|
1975
|
1992
|
433
|
June-91
|
|
Chiba
|
Japan
|
p
|
1979
|
|
96
|
Oct-96
|
|
TRIUMF
|
Canada
|
p-
|
1979
|
1994
|
367
|
Dec-93
|
|
PSI (SIN)
|
Switzerland
|
p-
|
1980
|
1993
|
503
|
|
|
PMRC, Tsukuba
|
Japan
|
p
|
1983
|
|
593
|
July-98
|
|
PSI (72 MeV)
|
Switzerland
|
p
|
1984
|
|
2753
|
Dec-98
|
|
Dubna
|
Russia
|
p
|
1987
|
|
40
|
Dec-98
|
|
Uppsala
|
Sweden
|
p
|
1989
|
|
| |